top of page

How to Write Donor Communications Your Donors Will Love—and Remember

  • 5 hours ago
  • 6 min read
Blurred documents on a blue background with bold text: "How to Write Donor Communications Your Donors Will Love—and Remember."



A few years ago, we asked a group of alumni board members to do something simple before our next meeting. We asked them to bring every piece of mail and donor communication they had received from the university over a three-month period.


These were not one-time donors but deeply engaged alumni who supported multiple schools, programs, and priorities across campus and consistently showed up by attending events, volunteering their time, answering our calls, and investing deeply in the life of the institution.


When they walked into the room, many of them carried literal stacks of mail. Envelopes. Newsletters. Annual reports. Event invitations. Emails printed out. Impact pieces. Campaign updates.


The pile was huge.


Then, we asked a second question. We invited the group to tell us which pieces they remembered, which ones they opened immediately, which they read more than once, and which they shared with a spouse or saved. The answers certainly surprised some people in the room, but it should not have surprised us. 


Very little stood out.


What stood out? It was not the most expensive pieces or the longest reports, but the communications that felt personal and intentional, as if they had been written for one person rather than pulled from a database.


That meeting, that moment has stayed with me throughout my career in donor relations, and it has shaped how I think about every acknowledgment, impact report, and stewardship communication we send. If we want donor communications to resonate, we have to stop thinking about what we want to say and start thinking about what donors need to feel.


Here are 5 ways to start writing donor communications your donors actually want to read:


1. Start With the Donor, Not the Institution

The most meaningful donor communications are donor centered from the very first sentence. Too often, we lead with institutional language. Too many times, we talk about strategic priorities, transformational initiatives, and long-term vision before we ever acknowledge the person reading the letter.

Donors do not give to institutions. They give to a shared purpose, people, and outcomes. A simple shift in language can change everything.

Instead of opening with a description of a program, start with gratitude that feels real. Name the donor’s role. Acknowledge their partnership. Make it clear immediately that this communication exists because of them. Even when a letter is technically correct, it can feel impersonal if it does not reflect why a specific donor chose to give. 

When I review letters or reports, I often ask one question. Could this letter be sent to any donor at any institution? If the answer is yes, then it probably will not resonate with the recipient.


2. Make It Feel Custom, Even When It Is Not Fully Custom

One of the biggest misconceptions in donor relations is that meaningful communication must be entirely bespoke to be effective. While highly customized stewardship is powerful, it is not always realistic or scalable.

What matters most is that the communication feels custom.

That feeling comes from specificity. It comes from relevance. It comes from intentional choices.

Use the donor’s giving history to guide your work and what you highlight. If a donor supports scholarships, do not lead with general support. If they care about faculty, then introduce them to the people doing the work. And if they give to multiple areas, acknowledge that breadth and loyalty.

Over the years, I have seen many donors respond deeply to letters that reference a single sentence from a previous conversation, or a long-standing interest that we have documented well. Those details tell our donors everything. The details signal that we are paying attention.

Every small touch matters––referencing the specific area the donor supports, mentioning the population impacted or connecting their gift to something tangible and human. A simple rewrite can make a big difference, as shown in the example below: 


Generic Opening: Thank you for supporting our organization’s mission to serve families in our community. Your generosity helps us provide important programs that make a difference in the lives of many people.


Donor-Centered Opening Rewrite: Thank you for supporting the Boys and Girls Clubs after-school program. Because of your generosity, students have a safe place to go each afternoon where they receive tutoring, mentorship, and a warm meal. Families in our community depend on this support, and your gift helps make it possible.


Custom does not always mean complicated. It means thoughtful.


3. Show Impact Through Story, Not Just Data

Our donors want to know their gift made a difference, but data alone will rarely create that connection. Don’t get me wrong, numbers are important. They establish credibility and scale, but stories are what make impact real. The most effective impact communications combine light metrics with narrative. They show what changed because the donor showed up. Instead of listing outputs, describe outcomes. Instead of reporting activity, explain transformation.

I often encourage teams to ask a simple question: What looks different at your organization because this donor gave?

That answer might be a student who stayed enrolled in a program, a patient who accessed care, a faculty member who launched a new line of research, a program that reached people it could not reach before. When donors can picture the impact of their giving, they feel connected to it. And when they feel connected, they stay engaged.


4. Use a Human Voice, Not an Academic One

Many donor communications struggle because they sound more like journal articles than conversations. This is especially true in academic medicine and higher education, where we are surrounded by experts and complex work. The instinct is often to explain everything in detail to prove importance. The result is language that feels dense, overly scientific, or inaccessible. Donors do not need to understand every mechanism or methodology. They need to understand why the work matters and why their support is essential.

Be sure to write the way you would speak to a donor across a table, with language that is clear, warm, respectful, and confident. If a sentence requires multiple rereads to understand, then it probably does not belong in a donor communication. The goal is to keep the meaning while making the sentence easier to understand and more human to read. Consider the difference below.

Academic Voice: The scholarship initiative seeks to address barriers to access for first-generation students through strategic financial support and targeted academic programming.

Donor-Focused Rewrite: This scholarship helps first-generation students attend college and succeed once they arrive. Your support opens the door for talented students who might not otherwise have the opportunity.

5. Be Clear About Why This Communication Exists

Every donor communication should have a clear purpose. Are you saying thank you? Reporting impact? Reinviting engagement? Deepening understanding?

Too many pieces try to do everything at once, which leaves donors unclear about what matters most. Before drafting, I encourage teams to articulate the single most important takeaway for the donor. If you want them to remember only one thing, what should it be?

Clarity creates confidence. Confidence builds trust.

What to Avoid

Here are a few common pitfalls that consistently weaken donor communications: 

  • Overly scientific or technical. Precision matters, but clarity matters more. If you need to explain complex work, do so in plain language.

  • Communications that are too wordy. Length does not equal depth. Respect your donor’s time––say what matters and say it well.

  • Generic language that could apply anywhere. Phrases like world class, cutting edge, and transformational lose meaning when overused.

  • Centering the institution instead of the donor. Donors should never have to search for their role in the story.

  • Assuming engagement means understanding. Even highly involved donors benefit from clear, thoughtful framing.


The Goal Is Relationship, Not Just Reporting

The best donor communications do more than inform. They strengthen relationships. They remind donors why they give, affirm their values, and reinforce trust. When donors feel seen and understood, they stay connected. When they feel like one of many, they drift off to find a place where they feel appreciated.

That meeting and the room full of mail taught me something important: Donors are willing to engage, but we have to earn their attention. Every piece of communication is an opportunity not just to report, but to resonate. Most importantly, when we write with intention, clarity, and respect for the donor, that’s when our communications stop feeling like noise, and start feeling like partnership.

And that is what donors remember.


Written by Holly Kizer


 
 
bottom of page